Dowie bites the dust again. But this time I'm not happy about it!

So, after 12 games into the season, the money men at QPR have already become unsatisfied with their first manager, Iain Dowie.

The misfit manager was sacked hours before his team were due to face Reading, as he left his fifth club in six years.

The puzzling thing about his exit, though, is that QPR were one point away from the playoffs as they were in a comfortable ninth position at the time of his departure.

When Formula One tycoon, Flavio Briartore led the Italian revolution at Loftus Road last summer, eyebrows were raised at the appointment of Dowie, renowned as being a ‘graft’ manager, not one for Italian flair.

Rumours quickly mounted that the manager had been put in place purely to push QPR out of the Championship, as he had previously been successful with my team, Crystal Palace. Once they had conquered this tricky league, there was a clause in his contract which allowed the club to give him a pay off and send him on his way, ready for a higher profile boss to come in and take the reigns.

Obviously, as a Palace fan I was fairly unhappy about Iain Dowie’s deceitful move to rivals Charlton, and, it has to be said, delighted at his subsequent departure.

But this is another example of the money men emerging from oversees and having a negative effect on the British game. Young managers and players are never going to get a chance whilst foreign imports are brought in with a blank cheque book.

Until today I had never been against the flood of oversees personnel in the game, as it has arguably made English football the most exciting and impressive in the world.

However, whatever your opinion on Iain Dowie, he is a young manager, and has had his reputation tarnished by a group of foreign investors, with whom he could never have done enough so stop the axe.

From a fans perspective, going up under Dowie, grafting away with Championship level players, would be a great achievement and one heck of a roller coaster ride.

Seeing your enthusiastic manager with a (probably) international level gaffer, who is likely to provide a wooden season sitting at the top of the league, is less likely to inspire.

Of course, no one will turn down a swift return to the Premiership, you’d need your head examining if you did.

But, as someone who was at the Millennium Stadium to witness a dramatic play off final win against our London rivals, West Ham, I can tell you for free that there’s no more intense a feeling than knowing your minutes away from having it all taken away from you, or reaching footballing heaven.

For now, I’m happy with having Neil Warnock at the helm of the good ship Crystal Palace.

But if we encounter a similar fate to that of QPR, I’ll be off to sip Bovril on the terraces of Aldershot Town.

Cons making comebacks

Two weeks ago, former Plymouth Argyle goal keeper, Luke McCormick was sentenced to seven years and four months in prison, following charges of death by dangerous driving and driving under the influence of alcohol.

The 25 year old was convicted following the death of two children involved in the car crash, and will face his parole review in 3 years.

Without intending to explore the moral implications of what McCormick did, or his personal character as a man, I’ll focus on the future of his career.

Although the stopper is still very early in his goalkeeping career, could he really return to the football league after 3-7 years out of the professional game? Should he keep up his fitness levels and get in between the sticks for the bullish prison team, or hit the books and fall back on education to find a new job?

Step forward ex-convict and prolific football league goal scorer, Lee Hughes.

The 32 year old striker make 360 appearances and netted 156 goals before he was adjudged to have been guilty of death by dangerous driving in 2004.
A sentence of six years imprisonment seemed to rule Hughes out of any further involvement in football.

However, three years later, upon his release from prison, he tied up a two year contract with League One outfit, Oldham Athletic.

25 games and 12 goals later, Hughes is still finding his feet in a bid to reignite his former prowess as an first-rate English striker.

6 goals in 8 games from the forward this term have fired Athletic to third in the table, Hughes is obviously hoping to revisit some of his former stomping grounds in the Championship next season.

Whether or not someone has made a mistake is irrelevant in this issue, as Hughes was granted the right to carry on playing, and he has worked remarkably hard to do so.

Luke McCormick will have a tough decision to face as to if pursuing his football career is worth the strain. He has to rely on hard work, mental toughness, and a club willing to take a chance on him.

Window still shut as managers need breathing space

After 10 games in the football league, some teams will be wondering what went wrong. From injuries flooding the physio’s room, to the summer signings who haven’t impressed as much as everyone thought, teams in the bottom half of the table will be looking for answers.

Thanks to the transfer window, though, there are none.

Since 2004 when the summer and January windows were introduced, clubs have been limited to ‘emergency loans’ throughout the playing season.

Whilst being good opportunities for players to go out and get experience, and for their feeder club to gain an exciting young addition to the team, there is no long term benefit.

Prospects such as Scott Sinclair, who circulate the football league in a bid to chalk up some matches, usually make a big impact at their loan club. Unfortunately, this lasts all of 5 matches and then they are off again.

The problem is that loans do not provide stability, and they do not provide sustainability.

The long term prospects of a team are not benefited by players coming and going, and the bridge between the gap of the top flight and lower leagues will always get bigger whilst this continues.

So, what are the advantages of the transfer window? Well, as far as I can see, not many.
It upholds the main functions of English football in the 21st century, which is to keep the rich at the top and the smaller teams at the foot of the table.

The transfer window system has boosted press speculation and wild transfer rumours, which has increased an already extortionate British transfer market tenfold.

Larger teams can charge ridiculous amounts for average players, with managers forced into panic buys at the end of a busy window in an attempt to appease the board and the fans.

The FA wants to address the amount of foreign players in the English football.

The best option is to wipe transfer windows from the record, watch the value of British players plummet to a reasonable rate, and then reap the rewards of home grown players plying their trade up and down the country.

Punished teams burst out of the traps in a bid to avoid the drop

I feel as though this blog may start to become a bit of a broken record, but I am about to discuss the ineptitude of the FA again this week.

Since Sky Sports began to pump money into football, and namely, the Premiership, the gap between those dizzy heights and the football league has stretched every year. With little money being circulated in those lower divisions, it is no surprise that the odd team has gone into Administration.

And what better way to celebrate a team’s bankruptcy than to fine them a certain amount of points, just to make sure no one buys them and they plummet down the table all at the same time.

This year, League Two was rocked by Luton being hit with 30 point fine and Bournemouth and Rotherham both receiving minus 17.

Of course there was no compromise, no change of legislation to accommodate this extraordinary punishment, just another day at the office for the FA.

So far this season, Rotherham have racked up 15 points, which leaves them on -2. If the deduction hadn’t taken place, they would be nestling in the playoff places.

Bournemouth have claimed 9 points, which would bring them up to a respectable 13th position. And Lastly, Luton, whose morale must be lower than anyone else’s, have chalked up 11 points, which would have taken them to the heart of mid table at 12th.

If that’s the way it worked out, those impressive starts would have almost certainly meant that the clubs took pride in their position, and began to iron things out in the club. Prospective buyers would have snapped up the chance to buy a team full of heart, and the players would be less inclined to leave in the January transfer window.

I for one will be keeping a beady on eye on those teams this year and hope they manage to compete in the league before the season is up.

I have no affiliation to these teams, nor do I think that they have any divine right to be in League Two.

But the FA needs to understand that all they are doing with point deductions is making a league, which already has dwindling attendances, less competitive, which affects everyone involved in English football.